Now tell us, how is the
Sanskrit the ancient language? The North Indians want to see themselves as light skinned. This is the fate of stupid India.
Read SIVAMALA's post in UNARVUKAL.COM below:
1.3 Non-Existsnce of Sanskrit Before 500 BC /bThe prime fact which has been suppressed by the Anglo-Brahmin elite is that Sanskrit did not exist prior to the 6th century BC. This circumstance is evident from the following points :
bVedas - The word `Sanskrit' does not occur anywhere in the
Vedas. Not a single verse mentions this word as denoting a language.
Chandasa - The
Vedic language was referred to as Chandasa even by
Panini himself
Chatt., p. 63 , and not as `Sanskrit'.
Buddha - The Buddha was advised to translate his teachings into the learned man's tongue - the `Chandasa' standard Chatt., p. 64 , there is no mention of any `Sanskrit'. The Buddha refused, preferring the Prakrits. There is not even a single reference in any contemporary Buddhist texts to the word `Sanskrit'. This shows that Sanskrit did not even exist at the time of the Buddha and that the people at that period, even the Brahmins themselves, were not aware of themselves as speaking `Sanskrit'; they referred to their language as `Chandasa'.
Ramayana - The word `Sanskrit' occurs for the first time as referring to a language in the Ramayana : "In the latter Ramayana the term `samskrta' "formal, polished", is encountered, probably for the first time with reference to the language"
--
EB 22 `Langs', p.
616 It is to be noted that
extant versions of the Ramayana date only to the centuries AD.
Asokan Script - The first inscriptions in Indian history are in
Prakrit and not in Sanskrit. These are by the
Mauryan King
Ashoka (c.
273 BC -
232 BC ), and number over 30. They date to the 4th century BC. The script utilised is not `sacred'
Devanagari, and the language is not `Mother' Sanskrit. They are mostly in the Brahmi script, while 2 inscriptions are in Kharoshtri. They are in various Prakrits and some in Afghanistan are in Greek and
Aramaic Bas,. p. 390-1 . In fact all inscriptions in India were in Prakrit till the early centuries AD : "The earlier inscriptions up to the 1st century AD, were all in Prakrit"
-- Up., p.
164
Satavahana Inscriptions - The Satavahanas, the first historical dynasty of the
Deccan, also used a Prakrit language. There is no usage of Sanskrit. The Nagarjunikonda insrciptions are by the Satvahana king
Vijaya Satakarni in the early 3rd cetnruy AD & end with the Ikshvaku Rudrapurusadatta who ruled for 11 years in the second quarter of the 4th century. Most of the large number of inscriptions are in Prakrit and only a few belonging to Ehuvulu Santamula are in Sanskrit (he ruled during the last 24 years of the 3rd to the early 4th century AD ) but even most of his inscriptions are in Prakrit and those which are in Sasnkrit are heavily influenced by Prakrit
Bhatt., p.
408 ftn. 46 .
The Nanaghat cave inscriptions in
Poona distt. are in Prakrit and are the work of the Satavahana Satakarni I. They have been dated to the first half of the 1st century BC. The contemporary relgiion of this region was Vedic.
Indra and
Vasudev are mentioned as the Vedic gods then worshipped Bas, p. 395 . The later cave inscriptions of
Nasik in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD are in the local Prakrit Bas, p. 395 . Thus, although the Vedic religion was followed in the Satavahana regions, Sanksrit was not in use.
Gandhari - Even Gandhari existed prior to Sanskrit. The
Pali Dhammapada in Gandhari was discovered at Khotan in Kharoshtri script. It dates to the 1st or 2nd century AD. A Gandhari insrcription was discovered on a copper casket containing
relics of the Lord Sakyamuni Bas, p.
393 .
Kharavela's Kalinga
Inscription - Kharavela's Kalingan
inscription of the 1st century BC were in a Prakrit of the east indian type.
Interseting is the first mention of the word Bharatavarsha in an inscription. Kharavela is described as invading Bharatavarsha, which then evidently denoted only North India Bas, p. 393 .
First Sanskrit Inscription : 150 AD - The earliest inscription in Sanskrit is by the
Saka
ibid.